IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] LDP IPv6

Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net> Thu, 08 April 2010 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF1B3A695F for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6410sZE82rs for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from the-host.globaltransit.net (unknown [203.223.132.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118EF3A6838 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=the-host.localnet) by the-host.globaltransit.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mtinka@globaltransit.net>) id 1NzjEv-0000cK-8A; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:21:13 +0800
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
Organization: Global Transit International
To: mpls@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:21:10 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.12-0.2-desktop; KDE/4.3.5; i686; ; )
References: <h2g77ead0ec1004061223k7cc69585ncf8761efb0df2d33@mail.gmail.com> <q2y77ead0ec1004072116s6d8d7de6pe376daf9d4c0dc64@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <q2y77ead0ec1004072116s6d8d7de6pe376daf9d4c0dc64@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart12713434.npasLWiqJk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201004081221.11915.mtinka@globaltransit.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] LDP IPv6
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:24:51 -0000

On Thursday 08 April 2010 12:16:01 pm Vishwas Manral wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-mpls-ldp-ipv6-03
> 
> We have a new version of the LDP IPv6 draft. The draft
>  has been around since 2008, however we are now seeing
>  operators asking for it (and can be seen in some
>  discussions in the RIPE mailing lists).
> 
> We would want to hear comments on the same from the list.

I've been tracking this draft since it first appeared, and 
the latest iteration addresses some of the aspects I 
previously thought about.

I'm in support of this draft, and as an operator with a 100% 
MPLS and BGP-free core (for IPv4, anyway), I'd be glad to 
see vendors begin implementation plans.

Cheers,

Mark.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email